Skip to content


giugno 26, 2013

If carbon dioxide is so bad for the planet, why do greenhouse growers buy CO2  generators to double plant growth?
By Mike Adams.

(NaturalNews)  For only “pennies a day,” any greenhouse owner can produce CO2 to help increase  plant yields in their greenhouses. That’s the message on CO2 generators sold by  greenhouse supply companies across the United States and Canada. “1,500 ppm [of  carbon dioxide] can be achieved… these generators automatically provide the  carbon dioxide needed to meet maximum growing potential for only pennies  a day,” the ad says.
View it yourself in this picture taken from a  greenhouse supply magazine:
CO2  generators “improve plant quality” and “increase production.” They’re made in  the USA and run on propane or natural gas, turning fossil fuels into carbon  dioxide.
Why does this work to radically improve plant growth, health and  yields? Because — are you ready for the truth? — CO2 is a plant  NUTRIENT.
Nope, it’s not a pollutant that threatens human  civilization as has been ridiculously claimed by global warming doomsday  pushers. CO2 actually increases plant yields, accelerates “re-greening” and  improves reforestation of the planet. And while today’s atmosphere contains only  400 ppm of carbon dioxide, CO2 generators can help raise that level to 1500 ppm  inside greenhouses, thereby accelerating plant growth and food  production.
Here’s the ad so you can see it for yourself:

Is CO2 is so bad for the planet, why do greenhouses pay to produce  it?

If CO2 was so terrible for the planet, then installing a CO2 generator  in a greenhouse would kill the plants. But scientists and even governments  actually recommend supplementing CO2 in greenhouses  in order to boost plant growth and food production.
“The benefits of  carbon dioxide supplementation on plant growth and production within the  greenhouse environment have been well understood for many years,” says the Ontario  Ministry of Agriculture and Food.
“CO2 increases productivity through improved plant growth and vigour. Some ways  in which productivity is increased by CO2 include earlier flowering, higher  fruit yields, reduced bud abortion in roses, improved stem strength and flower  size. Growers should regard CO2 as a nutrient…  increasing  the CO2 level to 1,000 ppm will increase the photosynthesis by about 50% over  ambient CO2 levels.”
In fact, as recent scientific studies have shown,  the slight rise in CO2 levels of the atmosphere has actually helped re-green  deserts and arid areas, accelerating the growth of trees, shrubs and grasses  which produce the oxygen human needs to breathe.

Attacking carbon dioxide is hate speech against Mother Nature

The more  you really examine the scientific truth about carbon dioxide rather than the  politically-charged “hate speech” against Mother Nature being spewed by people  like Al Gore, the more you realize CO2 is a crucial nutrient for the Earth’s  environment and ecosystem. In fact, the vast majority of all the CO2 released  into the atmosphere is produced by Mother Nature via animals in the ocean.  Anyone who criticizes CO2 is attacking ocean life and condemning trillions of  aquatic creatures who exhale carbon dioxide as part of  their natural respiration. (Should they all be fined?)
As a society  interested in reforestation, expanding the diversity of plant life, nourishing  trees and re-greening deserts, we should no longer tolerate anyone engaged in  hate speech against Mother Nature and CO2. Those who attempt to demonize this  critical nutrient for the planet are engaged in a kind of hate-motivated  racism against plants.
If it’s not okay to condemn someone for being  black, why is it okay for people like Al Gore to engage in endless hate speech  against all the living beings that are green?
Besides,  all those people who keep sounding the alarm on CO2 are being too negative all  the time. Nobody spews more doom and gloom than Al Gore and the global warming  crowd who paint apocalyptic pictures of Earth’s future if we all don’t start  paying carbon taxes to the super rich. Stop being so negative!
They need to practice more positivity and repeat to themselves affirmations  like:
“CO2 is a nutrient for forests.”
“CO2 is produced by ocean  life.”
“CO2 brings balance to the global ecosystem.”
“CO2 is to  plants as oxygen is to humans.”
“CO2 can help transform barren deserts  into sustainable forests.”
Perhaps by staying positive, the global  warming fearmongers and doom-and-gloomers can calm down, take a few breaths  (with extra CO2) and recognize that what’s good for plants is good for the  planet.
In fact, I’m going to hyperventilate after writing this article  just to generate a little extra CO2 for the world. It’s my gift to Al  Gore.

For the record: NO, I don’t support burning fossil fuels

The No. 1  criticism of this story by the brainwashed hoards of Al Gore cult worshippers  will be that I must have been paid big bucks by the coal industry to write this  article.
Don’t be ridiculous. I’m the record — for at least a decade —  having exhaustively condemned the burning of fossil fuels. Even though the CO2  they release into the atmosphere is actually a nutrient, they release many other  pollutants such as sulfur and mercury (from coal). Scrubbers in the USA make  U.S. coal plants the cleanest in the world, but China’s coal plants are truly  sickening pollution factories.
I also believe it’s time to get humanity off the petrochemical habit and onto  something cleaner and more renewable such as low-energy nuclear reactions  (LENR), formerly called “cold fusion.” Recent analysis has confirmed, yet again,  that cold fusion is real and practical. Cold fusion could be harnessed and used  in place of coal to heat large quantities of water that drive steam turbines  which generate electricity.

In time, all of America’s coal power  plants could be switched over to cold fusion. Similarly, if improved battery  technology comes along, gasoline-powered vehicles could be switched over to  electricity, and if that electricity is powered by cold fusion, then it’s clean  all the way through the energy supply chain.

Fossil fuels are dirty  business: they’re dirty to extract from the ground, dirty to transport and dirty  to burn. But the CO2 they produce is not a pollutant; it’s a nutrient that’s  desperately needed by trees, grasses and shrubs all around the world. So while  there are lots of reasons to oppose the burning of fossil fuels around our  planet, CO2 is not legitimately one of them.

If all this talk makes you  hyperventilate, then feel free to experience a hefty dose of self-inflicted  guilt that you can alleviate only by sending all your money to Al Gore for all  the carbon dioxide  you’re generating.

Geoengineering and Chemtrails are the cause of climate change!

True Al Gore and Obama?

6 commenti
  1. Neema la fidanzata di Eta Beta permalink


  2. Cane sciolto permalink

    E tutti bevono.
    Salve Koenig.

  3. Urge un aggiornamento del tuo blog Koenig …
    Ciao Mastino del comitato ^_*

  4. ciao koenig 🙂


Inserisci i tuoi dati qui sotto o clicca su un'icona per effettuare l'accesso:


Stai commentando usando il tuo account Chiudi sessione / Modifica )

Foto Twitter

Stai commentando usando il tuo account Twitter. Chiudi sessione / Modifica )

Foto di Facebook

Stai commentando usando il tuo account Facebook. Chiudi sessione / Modifica )

Google+ photo

Stai commentando usando il tuo account Google+. Chiudi sessione / Modifica )

Connessione a %s...

%d blogger hanno fatto clic su Mi Piace per questo: